15 Responses

  1. [M] freckle
    [M] freckle May 2, 2012 at 2:53 pm |

    Okay I think Flickr refuses to show them as pictures but: blue -

     (different structures of blue but very boring)

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/7192875@N06/7136369145 (I like this one best)

  2. Leezaleigh
    Leezaleigh April 28, 2012 at 3:15 pm |

    I’m finally getting around to posting my blue picture! This was delicious :)

    I’m still having trouble with focusing… I work on microscopes so the trick I was taught was to go in and out of focus quickly and then go back to somewhere in between the out of focus range and then from there only tweak it. I’ve been trying to do this with my camera (and I probably just need more practice) but I can’t seem to get it right.  It looks perfectly focused when I take the picture, but then when I review on my computer not so much. Any suggestions besides practice more?

    1. Kortney Thoma
      Kortney Thoma April 29, 2012 at 3:49 pm |

      Ooh, wow! This is pretty cool! Looks tasty too! Thanks for posting!

  3. [M] freckle
    [M] freckle April 18, 2012 at 3:40 am |

    Hurrah, challenge!

  4. Opifex
    Opifex April 17, 2012 at 10:26 pm |

    This comes at a very opportune moment for me as I’ve just bought my first ever camera with a removable lens (Diana F+). I think the first lens I get will be a telephoto, just because none of my cameras have any zoom except the point and shoot digital. Of course the Diana is another in my ever growing collection of plastic fantastics, so image sharpness is not the order of the day for me.

    1. Kortney Thoma
      Kortney Thoma April 18, 2012 at 8:52 am |

      How cool! I’ve never played around with a lomography camera before but I’ve always wanted to! Please post some photos for us!

  5. [E]queSarahSarah
    [E]queSarahSarah April 17, 2012 at 9:25 pm |

    This also makes me want to kick 8 years ago queSarah for dumping a ton of money into a fancy film SLR, when the digitals are so amazing now.

    1. [E] Slay Belle
      [E] Slay Belle April 17, 2012 at 10:04 pm |

      I did this too. And I haven’t been able to upgrade my camera since.

    2. [M] QoB
      [M] QoB April 18, 2012 at 4:08 am |

      If it helps you should still be able to use most (if not all) of your lenses with a digital camera body, and a basic digital camera body (by ‘basic’ I mean a model 2/3 years old) can be got for much more affordable prices than newly-released ones.

  6. [E]queSarahSarah
    [E]queSarahSarah April 17, 2012 at 9:24 pm |

    I didn’t know the trick about flipping around lenses! Does that work for film cameras as well, or just digitals?

    1. [M] QoB
      [M] QoB April 18, 2012 at 4:11 am |

      I’ve never tried it with a film SLR but I can’t think of a reason why it wouldn’t. The advantage of a digital for it though is there is a lot more room for experimentation e.g.: this photo was taken with the lens reverse, and turned out well, but me moving the camera a few mm forward or back gave a completely different focus and effect.

      IMG_6619.JPG

      1. Kortney Thoma
        Kortney Thoma April 18, 2012 at 8:55 am |

        Ah, the photo didn’t work! :(

        I haven’t tried it but I have heard of people who do and that it works. Read up on it though–I came across something somewhere warning to turn off the auto focus or else you can damage your lenses! :S

  7. Hattie McDoogal
    Hattie McDoogal April 17, 2012 at 8:17 pm |

    Oh, this makes me miss photography! (I used to take it in college) I’ve been using my digital camera for so long now. I should use this as a wakeup call to bring my camera out of storage and take some good pictures this weekend!

  8. [E]SaraB
    [E]SaraB April 17, 2012 at 8:16 pm |

    This is pertinent to my interests because I just had to give back the macro lens I’ve had on extended loan. The other one I have that lives at home is much longer. I had to adjust to standing six feet away from my light box and zooming in to bring my jewelry into focus, but I’m digging how the narrow field of focus means I can add a subtle background that doesn’t take away from the pendants.

    (I don’t know if any of those words are right, but it makes sense in my head)

    1. [E]SaraB
      [E]SaraB April 17, 2012 at 8:23 pm |

      Depth of field! I don’t know why that phrase abandoned me earlier.

Comments are closed.