Romance novels are as mysterious and confounding as the emerald depths of our heroine’s eyes. Their pages overflow with sentimentality, romance, and ridiculous situations, much like bodices overflow with heaving bosoms. Throughout my adventures and dalliances with these books, I have learned these five things:
- In historical novels, any man with both title and money has a sordid past but it is nowhere near as sordid as either he or the gossip makes it out to be. This is always fun. The man is made out to be a total catch, except that he either: 1) ruined 50 innocent virgins, 2) had four sons out of wedlock, 3) killed his immediate family, or 4) was involved with truly sordid business dealings that have left half of London destitute. While some villains are truly villainous (he drove a girl to suicide and then blackmailed her father, for example), inevitably, the hero is guilty of a tiny crime or no crime at all. Generally, this does not end his guilt ““ only overflowing bosoms can do that.
- In historical novels, any young woman, unless she is a widow and even then sometimes when she is a widow, is always a virgin until she meets the man she will marry. I really love this trope, especially when they pull this stuff with widows. It’s not so much the whole, “She’s been married for years and still has not lain with a man!?” bit that gets to me nearly as much as the description of her partner’s surprise and interest in finding out that she was totally pure before he ruined her. It is Lolz City because it always ends in surprise (oh my!), anger (why didn’t you tell me?!), or deep respect (you must be a deep lady to still have an intact hymen after all these years). Oh fetishization of virginity, never change. By which I mean, no, really, change immediately and by “change,” I mean “cease to exist.”
- People back in the day got aroused ridiculously easily. Touch a man’s clothed arm with your gloved hand? Watch out! He might drive you into a ditch! Eat a strawberry or walk in front of him or wrinkle your nose? Uh-oh, we’ve entered Boner City! I mean, I might expect this from Victorians, what with their prudishness and totally amateur pornographic photography, but people today? With the Internet and birth control galore and total lack of morality?! You’d think that people wouldn’t get aroused just by seeing someone’s stocking.
- No one is ever entirely who they seem to be. Paranoia should run rampant throughout the romance novel universe. Old friends become lovers without any provocation. The men who look most angelic are often most demonic. The women who look most mousy are often the sexxxiest once you get them into proper clothes/out of their glasses. Remember ““ when you’re navigating the troubling channels of Romance Land, trust no one. They’re all chameleons and you’re the tasty locust.
- There’s a surprising amount of information in these things. Like, let’s say you’re really into the aristocracy and British men with stiff upper lips and formal manners. You’d learn a hell of a lot about various British eras thanks to these books. You’d learn terms like “the ton” or “phaeton” or “bluestocking” or “curricle.” Regardless of the time period, if you go historical, you’d be reminded, over and over and over again, that women could not own property or vote or do much of anything. Sneaking in information like this? That’s pretty cool.
11 replies on “Five Things I’ve Learned from Romance Novels”
OMG, I love LOVE Romance novels!!!!!! But the ones I love always have a pain in the neck, bad ass STRONG heroine and a man who is dying to “claim her” but then wakes up and smells the coffee and realizes that a real relationship is about partnership. Oh yeah, and sometimes the woman learns something too, lol!!!
In the romance stories I love, the characters actually grow and have depth! And the authors I read completely debunk the myth that women were powerless simpletons in the past and show very clearly how we were moving and shaking even back in the day (sometimes out in front, sometimes behind the scenes but definitely not powerless!
Yes, they do exist!!! Lol!!!
Romance novels get a bad rap I think (but there are to many that are truly awful and meet every stereo type and I NEVER read those!)
But No. 5, learning history, I think is the best part. I’ve learned so much about different cultures from romance novels, not just British history mind you.
I think the world is completely over exposed and desensitized. I remember a lovely man told me that every part of a woman’s body is sexy and beautiful, like her ankle for example. I thought that was a beautiful sentiment. IMO, we really don’t need to “see” everything to be aroused. Sometimes suggestion is VERY arousing and I find that our show all do everything, (sex tape anyone?) culture has totally missed that.
By the way, I think torture is locking me up in a vault with several thousand Harlequin romances O-O
Could you recommend some of these to me?? I love romance novels but am having a hard time picking out good ones. I would LOVE LOVE LOVE to read one with a strong heroine.
Zoe Archer’s books are awesome and feature strong heroines.
Thank you!
Oh yeah, there are definitely some good ones out there. I think the genre as a whole is maligned, but with like so many things in pop culture, there are certain tropes that just seem to creep up. I do notice that the books I like the best always, always either 1. include a strong female character, 2. if it is set in the past, make the rampant sexism abundantly clear, or 3. create an equal partnership in the story. Most of the time, the good ones have all of that.
Now when I read, I find myself focusing more on the language of novels, looking at the use of military terms, for example. It’s fun for me? I guess that makes me a bit weird.
Awesome awesomeness. I too borrowed my mom’s romance novels as a pre-teen and still have a soft spot for them.
This list is amazing! and accurate! I have to say that I love the (very few) historical romance novels that DON’T deal with a virgin bride.
I first discovered romance novels in college. (The first one I ever read was The Pirate’s Jewel. I still own it and it will always be my fav.) The thing is, I went to a women’s college and always thought it was saying something about me as a feminist that I should love historical romance novels so much; so I definitely hid this guilty pleasure.
I still hide it, but any given day you can find me at the libs checking out the latest Enoch, Balogh, Kleypas, or Hunter romance novel.
You know what would be fun? A Persephone romance novel exchange. Lord knows I have a million in my basement…
Between the outfits and the ship coming in from nowhere, I am hooked on the cover of The Pirate’s Jewel. Amazing.
I have a lot of thoughts about romance novels and feminism and what-not, but they haven’t coalesced entirely. I am still working through it all.
I highly recommend The Pirate’s Jewel. Nolan is haunted by his past- but guess what! It’s not as bad as he thinks it is.
I would love to read your thoughts on romance novels and feminism.
I remember sneak-reading some of my mom’s historical romance novels when I was pre-teen age. I remember noticing that all the virginal heroines always bled a LOT when they lost their virginity, and they always, always had an earth-shattering orgasm their first time.
Years later, when I lost my virginity and neither bled nor orgasmed, I remembered those books, and just sighed in disappointment.
You just needed to have done it with a duke who chased a lot of lightskirts back in his day but due to a serious death in the family/injury/change of circumstances has mended his ways and is ready to settle down.
…or so I am told.